Posts Tagged ‘Birmingham’

EARLY VICTORIAN BRITAIN
BRITISH FURNITURE DESIGN during the
early Victorian period was confused. The prevalent styles were overlapping attempts at recreating looks from three key historical eras — the Greek, the Gothic, and the Rococo.
In reality, the actual forms of the furniture created at this time were largely standard and had little basis in the eras they purported to emulate. Rather, the “design” of a piece of
furniture was all about the surface and the applied decoration it carried.
GOTHIC, ROCOCO, AND GREEK Victorian Gothic was a masculine style based on idealized notions of Tudor furniture. New cupboards, chests, tables, and chairs were created by piecing together fragments of older furniture from grand houses.
AWN.Pugin
led a move towards a more authentic interpretation of the Gothic style. This was at least partially successful: his work on the interiors of the Houses of Parliament prompted Gillows to
introduce a range entitled “New Palace Westminster”, which was distinguished by the use of roundels incorporating a Tudor rose or thistle at the conjunction of the legs and stretchers.
The feminine Rococo taste was widespread throughout fashionable drawing rooms because of George particular interest in the revival. The florid decoration was structural —incorporated into the shape of the furniture rather than added to the surfaces. The heavy use of gilding was
condemned by architects, as it was used by many manufacturers to conceal shoddy construction.
The Greek style, informed by Henry Shaw’s 1836 Specimens of Modern Furniture, was simple and solid, refreshingly free from the extraneous decoration that was a Feature of much early Victorian furniture.
TRIED AND TESTED IDEAS The stagnant state of the industry can be demonstrated by the fact that the same edition of the London cabinetmaker’s; Union Book of Rules a depository of patterns used by the trade, was in print continuously between 1836 and 1866. This situation was exacerbated by a new middle class who did not want to appear uneducated: the majority of people would rather rely on tried-and-tested ideas than risk committing a gaffe. Whereas the wealthy consumer of the 18th century would commission furniture tailored to his exact requirements, the aspiring Victorian gentleman had to make do with whatever stock was available in the showroom of his chosen retailer,which generally consisted of rounded forms, such as the balloon-back chair, a staple of early Victorian design. The gradual mechanization that characterized the Victorian furniture industry led to a separation of the roles of designer and manufacturer, at least in urban centres.
The traditional role of the furniture-maker persisted in the provinces, as did many vernacular forms. In Lancashire, for example, ladder-back chairs were produced in stained ash instead of the mahogany fashionable in London.Pockets of craftsmen throughout Britain created Windsor chairs with idiosyncratic features typical of the region in which they worked.
Niche markets arose in provincial cities as craftsmen in certain areas developed expertise in specific fields. Birmingham was a centre for the
production of metal bedsteads, forged in furnaces fuelled by the coal and iron that were cheap and abundant in that industrial hub. Further east, Nottingham and Leicester were renowned as centres for cane and wicker furniture.
LIBRARY CENTRE TABLE
The octagonal, revolving top of this table is surfaced with green leather outlined by tooled and gilt lilies and centres on a lobed marquetry panel. The shaped border is inset with floral sprays and clusters of fruit, alternating with Oriental scenes framed by Rococo cartouches. The table has four frieze drawers and rests on a concave-sided central support. Four splayed, inward-scrolling feet and the shape of the apron reflect Louis XV influence. Ebony, tulipwood, mahogany, pine, and cedar are all used.
BALLOON-BACK DINING CHAIR
This balloon-back dining chair has a pierced scroll splat and is raised on acute cabriole legs. The upholstered seat is covered in green velvet. This style of dining chair was a popular early Victorian form. GorB
The back rail of this mahogany chair is carved and terminates in carved scrolls, where it meets the upholstered arms. The seat and back are padded. The chair is supported on carved, cabriole legs with brass casters

PAPIER-MACHE TRAY
This painted and gilt papier-mache tray has a curvilinear shaped outline and a deep concave rim decorated with gilt penwork leaves. The main panel is painted with a Himalayan mountain landscape, containing figures crossing a waterfall. c.1840.
BREAKFAST TABLE
This early Victorian mahogany breakfast table has a round, tilt-top with a moulded edge. The table top is supported on a lappet-carved column and collar, which stands on a circular platform supported by paw feet. c.1840.
BONHEUR-DUJOUR
This Louis XVI-style bonheur-du-jour of partebonized thuyawood is ormolu-and-porcelain mounted. The upper section has a tall, central, mirror-backed display cabinet with a three-quarter gallery flanked by similar, but lower,
cabinets, each with a central porcelain plaque. The outset lower section has an entrelac frieze with three drawers above mirror-backed shelves. It is raised on turned, tapered, and fluted legs on casters. The piece is a mix of Victorian and French Court styles. 1860.

Stoneware
British stoneware was probably first produced in London during the second half of the 17th century. Apart from the fine-bodied Wedgwood-type black basaltes and “jasper”-type wares there are three main types pes of British stoneware: grey-bodied, brown-
glazed wares of Rhenish type;
redware in the manner of Chinese Yixing stonewares; and white or off-white salt-glazed wares manufactured in several places including London, Nottingham, Bristol, and Staffordshire.
RHENISH WARE
The earliest datable material, from c.1660, was found at Woolwich, in London. John Dwight (c.1635-1703) was the first documented potter to make brown, salt-glazed Rhenish-style stoneware, and his production of more refined whitewares and red stonewares of the Yixing type began in 1672-3. Production in or near London was centred on Fulham and Mortlake and was generally based on German wares such as those from Cologne (including “bellarmines”), Raeren, and Westerwald. Wares include mugs, jugs, and tankards usually decorated with applied moulded motifs or scratched decoration of hunting or drinking scenes. Brown wares continued to be made throughout the 18th and 19th centuries at Mortlake, Fulham, and Lambeth. This group is mostly decorated with applied reliefs under a two-tone brown wash.
REDWARE AND WHITEWARE
Probably introduced to the Staffordshire area by migrant potters, stoneware became more refined during the 18th century, culminating in the sophisticated Neo-classical wares of Josiah Wedgwood (1730-95). Traditionally it is believed that redware was introduced by the brothers John and David Elers from The Netherlands shortly after their arrival in London c.1686. It was strongly influenced by Chinese Yixing stonewares, which were imitated in the Netherlands. Output consisted almost exclusively of tea and coffeewares and other domestic tablewares. Because the body was so hard it could be decorated by engine-turning on a lathe (after c.1765), and by applying delicate sprigs of flowers or scrolled ornament to the smooth, matt body.
Redware was also made in Staffordshire, and is often erroneously described as “Elers ware”. Some pieces are impressed with pseudo-Chinese seal marks on the base. This provincial type of redware fell out of favour in the latter half of the 18th century. White stoneware was probably developed in the third quarter of the 17th century. This fine ware could be slip-cast into fairly complicated forms, such as teapots in the form of shells, houses, or animals. Many examples are enamelled, and some are transfer-printed. This type of ware was supplanted by Wedgwood’s creamware in the late 1760s.
• TYPES Rhenish type: grey-bodied; redwares: inspired by Chinese Yixing wares; white/grey wares: bodies became very refined during the 18th century
• GLAZE all wares were salt-glazed; surface has a granular “orange peel” texture
• FORMS mostly jugs, cylindrical tankards, teapots; flatwares were made only after c.1700
• DECORATION sprigging; applied panels of hunting or revelry, or sporting scenes, sometimes taken from printed sources such as Hogarth’s A Modern Midnight Conversation; engine-turning on redwares; stamping; from the mid-18th century, enamelling was used on white wares, mostly copying Chinese fanzine-rose wares; transfer-printing is rare
• MAIN CENTRES OF PRODUCTION London: Fulham,
Lambeth, and Mortlake; Staffordshire; Nottingham
Marks
Apart from inscriptions and dates, stonewares are unmarked

Candelabra – table candlesticks with branches for extra lights – began to be made from c.1660 and increased in popularity, throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. A candelabrum consists of a central shaft with two or more detachable scroll branches supporting candle sockets; sometimes there is also a socket at the top of the shaft. Made in similar styles to candlesticks and by the scone makers, candelabra were likewise generally produced in pairs. Most found today, are in good condition, because they were better made and much more expensive than candlesticks and therefore were not subjected to the same amount of wear or damage.
THE EARLY 18TH CENTURY Silver Candelabra
Although examples are known from the late 17th century, few candelabra dating from before the 1770, survive today. Until the late 18th century most had two branches, but matching branches and stems were not particularly popular or fashionable until c.1750. As on candlesticks, detachable nozzles for the sockets appeared c.1740. To be of value to collectors, a candelabrum should have all its separate parts – the branches, the nozzle, and the stem – in the same style and hearing the same maker’s marks. Before -.1750 branches were often considered awkward and so were discarded and the stem used as a candlestick.
French silversmiths createdd some of the finest Rococo candelabra in the early and mid-18th century. One of the most famous examples is a single three-hranched candelabrum designed in 1734-5 by juste-Aarele Meissonnier (1695-1750), Royal Goldsmith to King Louis XV of France, and executed by Claude DLIVivicr (1688-1747) for the English Duke of Kingston. It has an extraordinary, asymmetrical, spiralling stem with three richly sculpted branches ending in flower-shaped sockets, and a cast finial in the form of a cluster of leaves, which can be removedto hold a fourth candle. Such pieces fully exploit the plastic, sculptural qualities of cast sib, er, and had a particular influence in England, where elaborate Rococo candelabra were made by such leading silversmiths as George Wickes ( 1698-11-61) and Paul de Lamerie (1688-1751) in the 1740s and 1750x. All such pieces are exceptionally rare and valuable today and fetch high prices on the market.
THE LATER 18TH CENTURY Silver Candelabra
In the early 18th century the hour for dining was generally about 3p.m., but lit the latter part of the century it was put back and the main meal of the day was often eaten after dark. For this reason, more light was needed, and so candelabra from the 1770s onward usually have at least three branches. Elegant and light Neo-classical forms, with fluted or plain tapering baluster stems, simple, slender branches, and urn-shaped sockets, all decorated with beading and reeding, were especially popular. Such designs were produced in cast and loaded sheet silver and Sheffield plate; some candelabra have silver stems but Sheffield plate branches, perhaps to reduce the cost. Similarly, candelabra made entirely in Sheffield plate often had a matching set of more expensive silver candlesticks.
THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY Silver Candelabra
Massive, heavy silver-gilt candelabra are characteristic of the Regency period. Made largely to impress, these often form part of elaborate table centrepieces. Magnificent candelabra were made by the leading English goldsmiths Rundell, Bridge & Rundell (est. 1805) and by Paul Story (1771-1844) for the Prince of NXiale, (later King George IV) and his circle. Such pieces – such as one made by Edward Farrell in I824 – have five or more branches, sometimes with double sockets, and stems lit the form of caryatids or mythological figures. Earlier candelabra were often altered to suit new tastes: a pair of candlesticks ordered by the Earl of Carlisle from the firm Parker & Wakelin (est. -.1758) in 1770 was supplemented with double branches in 1780 and triple branches in 1826.
THE LATER 19TH CENTURY Silver Candelabra
Most candelabra made in the later 19th century are of loaded sheet silver or plate, and many have figures supporting the candle sockets or as decoration on the base. After the introduction of oil lighting, some candelabra were converted to oil lamps. in the second half of the 19th century a huge range of items, including candelabra, was produced using the new method of electroplating. Following the invention of the electric battery in the early 19th century, an English doctor named John Wright experimented with electrolysis to coat the surface of base-metal objects with precious metal. In 1840 the Birmingham firm of Elkington & Co. (est. c.1830), in partnership with Wright, took out the first patent for this new process. Known as “electroplating”, it involved the immersion into a plating bath of a nickel object attached to a positive anode and a block of pure silver attached to a negative anode. When the electric current was switched on, silver particles passed through the solution and were deposited on the nickel object; the same process could be used both for gilding and for replacing worn objects.
The introduction of electroplating led quickly to the decline of the Sheffield-plate industry. The new process was far safer than the old one, but its main advantage was that it enabled objects to be formed entirely by traditional silversmithing methods before being plated, making complex sculptural ornament possible. By comparison,handles and borders made in Sheffield plate had to be silver. Condition Is important stamped out from sheet silver, filled with lead, and applied.
Elkington & Co. and the marm, other electroplate manufacturers established in the 1850s and 1860s produced a huge range of electroplated items, from chargers, ewers, and centrepieces richly decorated with valuable ornament in various historical styles to cutlery, frames, and spoon-warmers. Elkington employed the French sculptor Leonard Morel-l.aclertil ( 1820— ) to design splendid Renaissance-style pieces for display at international exhibitions. The firm also used the process of electrotyping - taking a mould front an object and depositing onto it a thin layer of silver, backed with base metal - to produce facsimile copies of a number of historically important pieces of silverware, in particular a collection of Tudor and Jacobean silver held in the Kremlin Armoury in Moscow.
Since such large quantities of electroplate still exist, it is important to buy pieces in the very best condition. Electroplate can usually be distinguished from Sheffield plate by the harsher colour of the pure silver (the sterling standard was used in Sheffield plate) and the lack of visible series, and joins, which are hidden by the layer of deposited silver.