Posts Tagged ‘John Henry Belter’

BELTERAND THE ROCOCO REVIVAL
BELTER WAS THE STAR OF THE AMERICAN ROCOCO REVIVAL - HIS FURNITURE COMBINED TECHNICAL WIZARDRY WITH TRADITIONAL SKILL AND WON HIM THE ADORATION OF NEW YORK’S GLITTERATI.

JOHN HENRY BELTER ( 1804-63), as he came to be
known, was born Johann Heinrich Belter, near Osnabruck in present-day Germany. He was trained in the art of wood-carving in Wurttemberg, a town steeped in the traditional Black Forest traditions of hewing complex designs from the native hard woods. Befter left his homeland for America, arriving in New York in 1833. Within six years he had become a naturalized citizen of the United States, and was in business as a cabinet-maker in his newly adopted city as early as 1844. It was not long before his name, like that of Thomas Chippendale, became synonymous with the type of furniture he produced.
A SINGULAR TALENT
Unlike many of his contemporaries in the furniture business, Belter only ever worked within one idiom. Somewhat fortuitously, but also due in no small part to Belter’s own great skill, the Rococo-revival style in which he excelled remained in vogue throughout his career and long after his death. His great triumph, and the exclusive feature of his work that kept him in the vanguard of the competition, was the series of breakthroughs he made in the lamination process.
BELTER PATENTS
AT THE TIME BELTER WAS WORKING, THE US PATENT OFFICE WAS PROCESSING THOUSANDS OF APPLICATIONS A YEAR TO HELP FOSTER A CLIMATE OF INNOVATION. The distinctive style in which John Henry Belter worked would not have been possible
without his innovative technical and methodical achievements. A patent effectively acted as a limited monopoly sanctioned by the State, and could prove extremely
lucrative if used wisely. Although Belter was successful in securing a number of patents during his career, he apparently failed to exploit them to their full potential as he never became very wealthy.
Better fashioned strong laminate panels by affixing thin strips of wood together, the grain in each layer lying perpendicular to that of the layer below. This practice enhanced the natural strength of the wood, rendering it extremely resistant to cracking or Splitting. Rosewood was especially fashionable at the time – Better sourced his from Brazil and India – but he also worked in oak, mahogany and other hard oods, sometimes ebonizing them.
DRAMATIC CURVES
A typical Better piece might be constructed from a series of eight-ply laminate boards, although he sometimes used up to 16 layers of wood. Additional panels carrying carved decoration were often glued on to the frame of a piece of furniture. These panels had been bent under extreme pressure with the application of steam to produce the dramatic curves that are a hallmark of Belter’s oeuvre, along with tight C” and “S” scrolls. The hardiness leant to wood by Belter’s lamination process enabled him to produce elaborate open crestings and aprons.
High-backed chairs provided him with an ideal canvas for his carving skills. Naturalistic depictions of flowers and fruits – vines were a favourite –feature alongside more Classical motifs such as scrolls. It is often only the quality of the carving and the audacity of the openwork that show that a piece came from his workshops. Better’s furniture was of a
consistently high quality and he was patronized
by some very wealthy New York clients. He
also designed a table in ebony and ivory for
display at the 1853 “Exhibition of the
Industry of All Nations”.
EXCLUSIVE TO A FAULT
Better’s refusal to cater to the mass market left him open to rivals who had no such qualms and made small fortunes selling a diluted version of Better’s pieces to aspiring, less wealthy consumers. Despite this, however, Better was not unsuccessful. In 1854, he had his own five-storey factory erected on Third Avenue, on the Upper West Side of
Manhattan. Two years later, he was joined in business by his brother-in-law, John H. Springmeyer. In 1861, William and Frederick Springmeyer also came aboard. When Better succumbed to tuberculosis in 1863, the Springmeyers continued in business. It is a testament to the singular skill of John Better that they were unable to survive for more than four years, despite the
unabated popularity of the Rococo-revival style that the firm had made its own. Better’s absence was felt keenly, and in 1867 the company was forced into closure.

Settles and sofas after 1840
The revival of interest in historical styles from the mid-19th century resulted in a multiplicity of designs for all types of furniture, including sofas, which were often made as part of the new salon or parlour suites. A major technical development during this period was use of the coil spring, patented in 1828, which resulted in sturdier, bulkier, and squatter designs that sacrificed form to comfort. These deeply upholstered seats, with their button backs, culminated in the Chesterfield, which was the first fully upholstered sofa.

Seat furniture
The period c. 1860 to (.1880 was in many ways the golden age of upholstery. Stuffing had been growing steadily thicker from the 1840s, and buttons were introduced to prevent the thread holding the stuffing
in place from pulling the covering material. Extra fabric was necessary to create the familiar diamond pattern of buttons or threads characteristic of the deep, luxurious upholstery, with its air of prosperity and comfort, so admired by the Victorian middle classes. The development of the coil spring made increased demands on buttoning. Whereas sofas had previously been stuffed with layers of wadding and horsehair, coiled metal springs were now used. The springs were supported by a layer of hessian webbing, covered with more webbing, which in turn was covered with horsehair stuffing and padding. As a result, Victorian sofas were much more comfortable than early 19th-century examples, but they were also much bulkier; many sofas had button backs to emphasize the new upholstered look. The luxurious effect was emphasized by the use of velvet and other elaborate fabrics. Sofas with their original worn upholstery arc more collectable today than those with high-quality restoration using an inappropriate fabric.
French sofas were generally lighter in design than British examples, since French craftsmen and manufacturers employed such revival styles as Rococo and Louis XVI, making use of giltwood and lighter upholstery fabrics. In the USA, parlour suites on a grand scale were produced by such leading makers as John Henry Belter (1804-63) of New York, who in the 1850s created laminated and moulded rosewood sofas with deep pierced carving. Renaissance Revival suites, with square-backed sofas, were also popular, while the fashion in Europe and the USA for “Turkish” corners gave rise to over-stuffed upholstered sofas with elaborate fringing.
Edwardian sofas of the first two decades of the 20th century borrowed heavily from Neo-classical styles –especially the designs of Thomas Sheraton (1751-1806) – and from Regency styles, but managed to avoid the excesses of Victorian interpretations. Suites of chairs with matching sofas were produced; these were generally made from mahogany, or occasionally from walnut or satinwood. Sofas and chairs often had caned backs and sides, with silk or damask upholstery.

•    CHALSES-LONGUES these are not particularly commercial as they can be large and not very comfortable to sit on; examples with good shapes are more popular, as are those that are more heavily carved
•    GILDING good-quality regilding is quite acceptable if well executed– the highlights should be burnished, and the quality of the carving evident; beware of spray gilding – this will have a flat, matt appearance, with a very even coverage
•    RE-UPHOLSTERY the condition of the upholstery should be carefully examined, as seating can be very expensive to re-upholster; furniture with taut webbing is
preferable to that with springing, which tends to give an overstuffed look
•    COLLECTING many sofas and settees were originally part of parlour or salon suites, which are now rarely found complete; three-seater examples are generally more commercial than two-seater