Posts Tagged ‘Meyer’

MODERNISM
CHAIRS
AS FURNITURE PRODUCTION steadily
shifted emphasis from craft-based manufacturing to industrial methods, so the look of the chair changed dramatically Ornament was doggedly erased from designs as structure became more important to the aesthetic look. Solid wood began to fall from favour (too expensive and inflexible) as moulded plywood and tubular steel stepped into the spotlight.
Just as the notion of open-plan space was creeping into Western architecture, so furniture was freed from fulfilling just one function. Chairs became
increasingly ambiguous, with some made for indoor and outdoor use, and others equally at home in an office or dining room. Chairs became lighter, too, as they were frequently moved around the house.
With mass production in mind, designers began to concentrate their efforts on fixtures. The aim became
to produce a chair made of a minimum number of components that fitted together easily and quickly It’s no surprise, then, that the cantilever chair became so popular, as the continuous loop of legs and base eradicated the need for numerous nuts and bolts.
While the structure of the chair became increasingly celebrated in its design, as opposed to any stylistic conceits, so the designer as an
individual receded into the background. Industry became more important than art, as designers sought to express nothing more romantic than the manufacturing process.
The reason the chair dominated the focus of designers’ effort`_ is because a person’s emotional attachment is far greater to a chair than to, say, a shelving unit. If Modernist designers wanted to alter their audience’s emotional and intellectual outlook, it was through the chair that they tried to do so.
The slender armrests display a use of cushioning that is rare fora chair by Marcel Breuer.
The steel struts beneath the seat have been bowed so they cannot be felt by the sitter.
The chair is made from non-reinforced tubular steel, thereby making it less rigid.
B34 CHAIR WITH ARMS
The frame of this cantilever chair is made from one continuous loop of tubular steel. Although the base looks as though it is all in contact with the floor, the side pieces bend slightly so that only the corners touch the floor — the idea
being that most floors are slightly uneven and the smallest change in level would make the chair wobble. This chair has arms with elbow supports, and a blue canvas seat and back. Designed by Marcel Breuer and produced by Thonet. 1928. H:85cm (33Vzin); W.57.5cm (22Vain); D:63cm (24-Xin), Qu I
This armchair was inspired by a model made by Alvar Aalto. The chair’s seat and back are made from a single sheet of laminated wood and sit within an oak open-arm frame. H:76cm (30in) CA
LANDI CHAIR
This easy chair comprises a series of square-section planks of pine, joined by wooden dowels. It has a slatted section on both seat and chair back. Designed by Hein Stolle. c.1930. BonBay 2
SIDE CHAIR
The seat and back of this early cantilevered chair are made of ebonized moulded plywood and sit on a chrome-plated tubular-steel frame. The armrests are ebonized beech. Mart Stam for Thonet. c.1930. BonBay 2
ZIG-ZAG CHAIR
One of a pair, this chair has a tubular-steel frame reminiscent of Rietveld’s Zig-Zag chair. The wooden seat is supported on steel rods and has a later vinyl cover. H: 82.5cm (321in); W.41.5cm (161in); D:63.5cm (25in). Qu I
Lightweight and durable, this stacking chair is made from pressed and bent aluminium. Each armrest and pair of legs is from one piece of aluminium. Hans Coray. 1938. H: 76cm (290); W.51cm (19in); D:55cm (21in). BonBay 2
CLUB CHAIR
AALTO-INSPIRED CHAIR
EASY CHAIR
The rectilinear frame is made from stained pearwood secured with brass fittings. The chair is upholstered in hand-woven woolen fabric. Peter Keler, Bauhaus Weimar. 1925. H:69cm (27in); W.62cm (24V:ln); D:68cm (26%0). WKA
LOUNGE CHAIR
CANTILEVERED ARMCHAIR
One of a pair, this armchair has a tubular-chrome frame and seat with cushions upholstered in a dark brown, brushed fabric with red trim. The armrests are black-enamelled. H:86.5cm (34in). SDR I
Designed by Gilbert Rohde, this cantilevered armchair has a bright chrome base and black laminated armrests. The cushions are upholstered in ivory leather with a black trim. H:94cm (37in). SDR 1
THE STACKING CHAIR
STILL FOUND IN CAFES WORLDWIDE, THIS ICONIC DESIGN IS PERHAPS THE FIRST STACKING CHAIR, AND CERTAINLY THE FIRST WIDESPREAD DESIGN, OF ITS KIND.
The so-called Bistro chairs These have a pressed-steel frame and are painted red; with plywood seats. c.1926. H:82cm (32Vin). DOR 3
The origins of this chair, despite the efforts of numerous historians, have proved murky at best. The design is most likely to have been developed in France some time around 1925, specifically for the country’s booming cafe culture. The chair bears a strong, albeit rather crude, resemblance to chairs designed by Emile Jacques Ruhlmann, although it’s doubtful whether the French high-society designer ever had a hand in its conception.
What is perhaps most impressive about the chair, apart from its stackability, is its economy of materials. The steel used is incredibly thin and, to give the legs rigidity, the steel has been subtly curved. To save further on metal, holes have been cut from the seat back. While the perfect low-cost, space-saving chair was to become something of a holy grail for 20th-century furniture designers, few ever bettered the chair design that first set the ball rolling.
FREE SWINGER ARMCHAIR
The base of this chromed-steel cantilevered armchair from Austria is the only part of the structure that is exposed. The chair seat and back are filled with down and upholstered in sand-coloured velour. H:84cm (331in). DOR 3
LAMINATED LOUNGE CHAIR
This chair has been made from one sheet of cut and moulded laminated birch and resembles the Gerald Summers classic (see p.438). The arms are fixed to the back with metal brackets. Hans Pieck. 1944. H:76cm (30in). Bon Bay 4
BAUHAUS ARMCHAIR
This chair was designed by Erich Dieckmann for the Weimer Bauhaus, in collaboration with Ernst Mayo. Made from solid beech, it has a bowed back and slatted seat. c.1930. H:81.5cm (321:in); W.52.5cm (21in). WKA
DINING CHAIR
This is one of a pair of stacking birch plywood dining chairs that were produced by Artek. The chair has a circular wooden seat and a pierced plywood back, supported on L-shaped plywood uprights. c.1930s.
DIAGONAL CHAIR
This chrome-plated, tubular steel chair is named after the supports between the seat back and legs. The arms, seat, and back are of laminated wood. W.H. Gispen. c.1927. H:82.5cm (321-in); W-54cm (2111n): D:60cm (23,Xln). QU 2
SLATTED CHAIR
This Viennese chair has a tubular-steel frame and solid, stained-beech wooden slats for the seat and back. The arms have wooden armrests. One of a set of four. 1925. H:84.5cm (33V4in). DOR 3

The Exotic: the 1860s and 1870s
In the 18 6os hair went up again and earrings returned to favour. Their comeback was marked by a great variety of types and styles. Size fluctuated throughout the period, but grew to enormous proportions in the late i 86os and early 18’70s, when earrings almost rested on the shoulder. This fashion, although started in France and England, spread throughout Europe, and we also learn from an article in the trade-paper Watchmaker, Jeweller and Silversmith of 187 5 that: ‘long pendent earrings are coming into fashion again in America.’
It was the great age of novelty. Women suspended from their ears any unusual and bizarre object they could think of. Among the favourite shapes for earring pendants
were windmills, buckets, shovels, hammers, hens brooding in baskets, and hum P. 78 ming birds. Even exotic creatures such as Brazilian beetles were suspended from ears
in the place of gemstones. Goldfish swimming in bowls were simulated by tinted in P 03 taglios. The Chinese-inspired ‘willow pattern’ is seen on many plate-shape gold earrings from 1870, enamelled in blue and white with the traditional pagoda, willow tree and figures on a bridge. Arrow earrings also appear to have been in great favour, P 79 either simply attached to the earlobe or designed in two sections so as to appear to transfix it.
Earrings of these types were not products of ‘haute joaillerie’ and not intended to be particularly artistic-, they were meant to be amusing and decorative, ‘novelty’jewellery to be worn for a season and then discarded. This explains firstly why they are always of little intrinsic value, being made of thin gold leaf decorated with enamel rather than gemstones, and secondly why few of them survive. They were certainly not the type of jewel to pass down in the family as an heirloom.
Interest in travel and advances in scientific knowledge together with the development of new industrial techniques, all affected the design of earrings around the middle of the century. New materials such as ‘Blue John’ or Derbyshire spar, lava from Vesuvius, colourful feathers of hummingbirds from Mexico, and beetles from Brazil, whose hard and green iridescent shell proved a successful and unusual sub-
stitute for gemstones, all made their appearance. The beetles were either simply at P. 107 tached to a gold hook to be inserted through the pierced earlobe or grouped more 126 elaborately in girandole arrangements. There were also exotic flowers, such as cas- P. roe
cades of stained ivory fuchsia blossoms; bunches of bulrushes set with turquoises baskets of flowers held by a hand, and acorns. The popularity of the latter is demon-
1o6 strated by its appearance among the drawings of Mellerio and by the firm’s ad-
vertisement in the magazine La Femme et la Famille et le Journal des Jeunes Personnel. p. 102, Animals were also favourite subjects; among the most amusing are frogs ready to
103 spring from bulrushes, nesting birds, brooding hens and coiled serpents entwined
with a vine spray. Hammers, ladders and well-pulleys with buckets reflect an interest P. 78 in industry. Although the fashion for novelty earrings appears to have started in
France, it assumed its most bizarre forms in England.
Classical revival
Another leitmotiv of i 9th-century jewellery is revivalism, a means of enriching the present by looking at the past. This had developed in the I 830S when designers such as Pugin in England and soon after Froment Meurice in France turned to Gothic art as a source of inspiration. Few examples of earrings in Gothic style are known, and those are usually made from Berlin iron, a material particularly well suited to reproducing Gothic tracery. The full bloom of revivalism occurs in the 18 6os and I 870s and this is particularly true of jewellery. The styles to be revived were mainly pre-Classical and Classical, Italian and French Renaissance and the period of Louis XVI.
Contemporary archaeological discoveries in Etruria and in the Greek Islands such as Knossos, Melos and Rhodes were bringing to light large quantities of exceptional ancient jewellery. The importance and popularity of earrings in antiquity was in some ways comparable to the 18 6os and 18 70s- It was natural, therefore, that antique shapes, designs and techniques were copied or reinterpreted in this period.
Among the leaders in this style were the Castellanis in Rome and Naples; they not only copied and reinterpreted the examples of the past but also set antique fragments such as engraved gemstones and coins as part of their interpretation of ancient jewellery. This is particularly evident in works like the gold and cornelian earrings set with Roman intaglios depicting a trophy of arms and a hunting scene.
P 97 Ernesto Pierret was another famous jeweller in Rome who produced earrings of Etrusco-Roman inspiration. A good example is the pair designed as a triangular panel decorated with bead-work and corded wire typical of Greek and Etruscan goldsmithwork flanked by baton motifs with spherical drop terminals probably inspired by the Roman crotalia which Pliny describes as ornaments designed to tinkle at every movement. This was a favourite motif for earrings and many examples survive where the baton-shaped drops are combined with various surmounts such as the Athenian owl with spread wings perched on a pediment.
The taste for Classical designs was widespread throughout Europe. Similar examples were produced by firms such as Robert Phillips in England and Eugene Fonte-
P 109 nay in France. Fontenay made great use of bead-work and corded wire in the mounts of his earrings, which were frequently set with carvings or enamel miniatures of scenes from Pompeian frescoes and had fringed drops and palmette or rosette surmounts.
Gold and pearl earring in archaeological revival style, circa 1870, inspired by the ancient Roman `crotalia’.
This archaeological fad was such that as early as 18 59 it became the target of satirical sketches. In ‘A Young Lady on the High Classical School of Ornament’, Punch (15 July 1859) depicted a devotee of the Antique style with an excess of jewels, tiara, hair ornaments, necklaces, bracelets, pendants and long earrings, all of Greek and Etruscan inspiration.
Some revivalist earrings derive specifically from well known antique prototypes while others are merely pastiches of different archaeological motifs. A good example
of the first type is the Etruscan a baule earring of 6th/5th century BC pedigree, which p. io, reappears, almost identical, in the late i 86os. It has one closed side, with a decoration of applied stylized flowerheads, rosettes and wirework typical of ancient examples. The enamel decoration is undoubtedly prompted by close examination of ancient a baule earrings, where inlays of glass paste, which unfortunately have barely survived, were used to enliven the decoration. This represents an attempt by the 19th-century jeweller to reproduce in its entirety the ancient prototype and stresses the past importance of polychrome work.
Subjects such as rams’ heads, miniature Eros figures riding birds, amphorae of p. 99, various shapes and blackamoors’ heads popular in late Classical Greek, Hellenistic and Etruscan earrings were revived in abundance. Not only were the forms derived from Antiquity but also the techniques: granulation was largely used — although never reaching the finesse of Antiquity — with wirework and beading to pick out details, and, as in the past, enamels were preferred to gemstones.
Other popular shapes of Antiquity which had never been related to ear ornaments were now converted into earrings, e.g., Carlo Giuliano’s miniature oil lamps decorated with black enamel, modelled on lamps used for votive offerings in temples and sanctuary precincts.
Even 19th-century ‘novelty’ materials such as lava from Vesuvius, Wedgwood jasper-ware and tortoiseshell were adapted to earrings inspired by the Antique. Somehow the frilliness typical of the 19th century creeps through the severe and linear shapes of archaeological Classicism, so that they could never be mistaken for
the real thing. This is particularly true of two pairs of earrings where Roman gold p. 98 low-relief and Greek amphorae are suspended from circular surmounts decorated with frivolous 19th-century flower motifs.
The typical fitting of all these earrings is a thin S-shaped gold hook inserted in the ear from front to back, at times secured, like many ancient examples, by an additional semicircular catch at the back.
Notable as a successful reinterpretation of Classical ideals is the emerald and diamond parure commissioned by Napoleon III from Mellerio; although its overall design is definitely archaeological, its pendent earrings of sober, sculptural shape p. 8o have no strict connection with any ancient prototype.
Besides Greek, Roman and Etruscan art, Egypt provided an important source of inspiration, not only in terms of shapes and designs but also of colour choice and com-bination. Interest in ancient Egypt was stimulated by the completion of the Suez Canal in 1869 and by the contemporary excavations in the Nile Valley carried out and
P 96, published by Auguste Marlette. Falcons, papyri, mosaic or gold Pharaoh masks and
113 scarabs were soon fashionable motifs to adorn the ears, and dramatic combinations of bright colours such as lapis or turquoise blue, deep red and opaque white typical of Egyptian art gained favour throughout Europe.
Renaissance and 18th-century revival
The Renaissance revival, with its interest in sculptural and figurative shapes and enamel-work, began in the 1840s in France but did not affect earrings until the 18 6os and 18 70s. Among the influential jewellers working in this style was Carlo Giuliano, an Italian who spent most of his working life in England. Among his most
P. striking works is a pair of earrings in gold and polychrome enamel, opaque and translucent, each in the form of a stork devouring a serpent. In this case not only does the enamel technique and the bold sculptural shape remind us of the famous Renaissance figurative pendants, but the symbolism too is Renaissance; the stork devouring a snake standing for the soul overcoming carnal pleasure derives from a well known Renaissance emblem.
Fantastic creatures such as dragons and griffins with pronounced sculptural quality and the widespread use of polychrome enamels were typical of the French Renaissance revival. What gives away the fact that these belong to the 19th and not the 16th century is their passion for ornate and frilly detail, which always tends to creep in and
P. detract from the boldness of the sculptural effect. This is particularly evident in the
fringe of pearls and rosette surmount of the griffin earrings reproduced.
P 79 The gold, polychrome enamel and hardstone cameo earrings, each set with a cameo mask holding a floral festoon suspended from a tree-headed mask surmount, which the London jeweller John Brogden exhibited at the Paris Universal Exhibition oft867, although imbued with a certain Renaissance feeling, are closer to late i 8th-century Neoclassicism. The choice of differently coloured agate for the two cameos of Classical Dionysus masks is a rather unusual feature for the period. It is interesting that in this case both the original design and the finished jewels survive.
P. 74, In France, among other revivals, that of the Louis XVI style was particularly
77 favoured by the Empress Eug6me who, anxious to emulate Marie Antoinette in establishing in France a ‘grand’ monarchic tradition, revived, together with the crinoline, all the girandoles, bows and ribbon motifs of French 18th-century jewellery. She commissioned J. -E. Bapst, the famous French jeweller, to remount part of the crown jewels in Louis XVI style. The great majority of pendeloque and girandole earrings revived at this time in France were set with pearls and diamonds, but Eugenie’s favourite stone was the emerald, and it quickly became the most popular coloured gemstone in France.
Fin de sihle
As a consequence of the opening up of Japan to trade with Europe in the 18 5os and of the revolution there in 1866, Japanese art, until then little known in the West, started to exert considerable influence on the evolution of ornament and decoration. In the mid- i 870s it became popular in Europe to mount small pieces of Japanese metalwork as jewellery. Shakudo and shibuichi, the metal inlay techniques developed by Samurai swordmakers for the decoration of sword mounts and guards, entered the world of jewellery. Shibuichi and shakudo plaques and miniature fans decorated with flowers, butterflies, insects, birds and bamboo provided with a small suspension hook became very fashionable earrings and the Europeans soon began to imitate them in chased gold and silver. A good example is the pair of pendent earrings in the shape of a rectangular plaque decorated with fan-shaped motifs.
The increasing ease of travel in Europe encouraged interest in foreign countries and people liked to bring home souvenirs of the localities they visited. Italy with its sights and monuments was amongst the favourite destinations. Souvenir earrings are usually made of materials which are typical of a certain location: Roman mosaics, or micromosaic, made of minute glass tesserae depicting sights of Rome or scenes from the Campagna, and Florentine mosaic made of larger pieces of variously coloured inlaid semiprecious hardstone, usually in floral patterns, were extremely popular. Roman and Florentine mosaics had in fact been used in jewellery since the early i 800s; the earliest form of mosaic earrings consisted of a simple oval plaque connected to a smaller panel surmount with fine gold chains. Later examples dating from the i 86os and 187os are much more varied in shape and often reminiscent of archaeological revival designs. Early examples of Roman mosaic earrings have almost unbelievably tiny glass tesserae, producing a precision of detail which matches that of painting. Later examples are much coarser.
Among the plethora of 18 6os and 18 7os earrings another type can be clearly distinguished, known as the ‘fringe’ earring. This usually consists of a circular or oval surmount above a fringe of articulated pointed drops. It was popular throughout Europe but especially fashionable in England around 1870 where the drops tight-
Three earring designs in pencil and gouache of the late i 870s, from the archives of Mellerio, Paris. Note the fringe ornament typical of the time.
ened up to form a compact fringe of tapered gold chains in contrast to their Continental counterparts where the pendent elements are frequently fewer and well spaced. The distinction is clear if one compares the French designs illustrated in Mellerio’s archives with English examples set with carbuncles, Wedgwood jasperware plaques
P. 123 or decorated with white and royal blue or turquoise coloured enamel. The inset of small pearls or diamonds in a starshaped motif at the centre of the gemstone or enamelled boss surmount is another typical feature of jewellery of the time. Archaeological influence is frequently noticeable on the surmounts of these earrings. Most examples are fairly voluminous and long, measuring approximately 6 to io cms; in spite of this, their weight is negligible since the fringes that constitute a large portion
p. i 1 of the earring are made of hollow gold drops or of light gold chain. More expensive examples of diamond-set fringe earrings, though less common, are well known.
Naturalism in jewellery reached its peak in this period under the spell of the Parisian Oscar Massin, whose naturalistic and botanically accurate creations characterized by tremblant and pampille decoration became a model for jewellers throughout Europe. Cascades of flowerheads, sprays of leaves and flowers and single flowerhead
P. 124, clusters were to be seen on grand occasions. The designs by Mellerio and by the Ger-
125 man Frederick Kreuter reproduced here illustrate the variety of forms fashionable at the time.
The star motif had been popular in jewellery since the 18 6os. At first its design was exploited mainly for brooches, and only in the late 18 6os was it introduced into earring design. Typical of this date are earrings mounted with large carbuncles, amethyst cabochons or enamelled gold bosses inlaid at the centre with a pearl or diamond
p. 116, star-shaped motif. In other examples the whole earring takes on the shape of a star
117 suspended by a simple hook from the ear. The basic six-pointed star offered scope for many variations: the points could multiply up to eighteen, of different lengths and widths. In the late 18 8os and 189os knife-wire settings came into favour and this, together with a taste for light and less symmetrical shapes, prompted the creation of elaborate earrings in the form of off-centre stars, comets and shooting stars. The favourite gemstones for this type of ornament were diamonds since they could best suggest real stars; less expensive versions were set with half pearls and very pale opals. Many sets were made in this style, comprising earrings, a brooch, and a necklace which could also be worn as a tiara; a design by Mellerio commissioned by Queen Isabella II of Spain is a good example.
Towards the end of the century the fashion for large and varied earrings subsided in favour of smaller and more sober ear ornaments, either clusters or single gemstones, simply claw- or collet-set in very unobtrusive, delicate mounts provided at the back with a flattened hoop fitting. The fashionable design for daywear in the 18 gos consisted simply of a single pearl embellished with small diamonds. At night the favourite earring would be a single diamond of varying size. The change towards smaller earrings was this time dictated not so much by hairstyles, since the ears were
Four ink designs for pendent earrings by Kreuter, Germany, 1867-70. The top one is star shaped; the second and fourth decorated with star and fringe motifs; and the third with a fringe only.
A collection of North Italian gold
pendent earrings, circa i 800. Their large size, linearity and two-dimensional, geometrical quality are typical of early t9th-century earrings in Europe. Many include a central plaque in relief stamped out of a thin sheet of gold, to simulate a cameo with a profile of a Classical warrior, a type of imagery which had become popular at the time of the Napoleonic campaign in Northern Italy Of 1796-97. Note the contrast between the austere profiles and the delicate lace-like filigree border decorated with typical hollow hemispherical motifs.
still left uncovered, as by the fashion for high frilled collars during the day and for the ‘collier de Chien’, or dog collar, at night, both of which dressed the neck and filled in the space between ears and shoulders. Long pendent earrings which visually interfered with high collars and neck ornaments disappeared almost completely. The few pendent earrings of the 189os were of moderate size, in the shape of very delicate pearl and diamond articulated drops which moved and reflected light.
The discovery of the Cape diamond mines in South Africa brought a plentiful supply of fine stones onto the market. A single, large, flawless, white diamond of high quality was now usually preferred to a fussy arrangement of small stones. The new abundance of diamonds also led to new ways of cutting: cushion-shaped diamonds, fat and bulky in order to retain the maximum carat weight of precious material, became thinner and circular in shape, with the culet or back facet reduced to a pin-point, thus exploiting to the maximum the exceptional optical quality of diamonds to reflect and disperse light. The new brilliant cut involved a waste of up to 5o% of the rough crystal but the final result was thought to be worth it.
Apart from diamonds, a variety of other stones were set in cluster earrings; often a larger coloured stone would be mounted within a border of smaller diamonds. Black Australian opals, together with pale and metallic sapphires from Montana, appeared on the market in the 189os; amethysts and peridots were great favourites and with their purple and lime green colours well complemented the pastel tints of contemporary dresses. In the 189os pearls and half-pearls were the preferred alternative to the more expensive diamond borders and with their delicate sheen particularly suited the soft silks in fashion during the last decade of the century.
The Art Nouveau movement, which reacted against the repetitiveness and lack of imagination in the decorative arts and jewellery and challenged the excessive emphasis placed on intrinsic value, promoted many new, original and daring designs — but not for earrings. There are hardly any Art Nouveau earrings, and the few that survive must be considered exceptions. An extraordinary pair created by Rene Lalique is definitely a ‘one off’. They are typical in their choice of less expensive materials (large milky opals, translucent enamels echoing the colour of the opals, richly coloured matt gold) and in the flowing line of the decorative thistle motif rendered in enamel at the front and engraved at the back. But they are unique in their unconventionally large size and their detachable clip fitting, a feature which became normal only in the I 930s. It is possible that such clip fittings were devised to allow the earrings to be worn as necklace pendants.

BELTERAND THE ROCOCO REVIVAL
BELTER WAS THE STAR OF THE AMERICAN ROCOCO REVIVAL - HIS FURNITURE COMBINED TECHNICAL WIZARDRY WITH TRADITIONAL SKILL AND WON HIM THE ADORATION OF NEW YORK’S GLITTERATI.

JOHN HENRY BELTER ( 1804-63), as he came to be
known, was born Johann Heinrich Belter, near Osnabruck in present-day Germany. He was trained in the art of wood-carving in Wurttemberg, a town steeped in the traditional Black Forest traditions of hewing complex designs from the native hard woods. Befter left his homeland for America, arriving in New York in 1833. Within six years he had become a naturalized citizen of the United States, and was in business as a cabinet-maker in his newly adopted city as early as 1844. It was not long before his name, like that of Thomas Chippendale, became synonymous with the type of furniture he produced.
A SINGULAR TALENT
Unlike many of his contemporaries in the furniture business, Belter only ever worked within one idiom. Somewhat fortuitously, but also due in no small part to Belter’s own great skill, the Rococo-revival style in which he excelled remained in vogue throughout his career and long after his death. His great triumph, and the exclusive feature of his work that kept him in the vanguard of the competition, was the series of breakthroughs he made in the lamination process.
BELTER PATENTS
AT THE TIME BELTER WAS WORKING, THE US PATENT OFFICE WAS PROCESSING THOUSANDS OF APPLICATIONS A YEAR TO HELP FOSTER A CLIMATE OF INNOVATION. The distinctive style in which John Henry Belter worked would not have been possible
without his innovative technical and methodical achievements. A patent effectively acted as a limited monopoly sanctioned by the State, and could prove extremely
lucrative if used wisely. Although Belter was successful in securing a number of patents during his career, he apparently failed to exploit them to their full potential as he never became very wealthy.
Better fashioned strong laminate panels by affixing thin strips of wood together, the grain in each layer lying perpendicular to that of the layer below. This practice enhanced the natural strength of the wood, rendering it extremely resistant to cracking or Splitting. Rosewood was especially fashionable at the time – Better sourced his from Brazil and India – but he also worked in oak, mahogany and other hard oods, sometimes ebonizing them.
DRAMATIC CURVES
A typical Better piece might be constructed from a series of eight-ply laminate boards, although he sometimes used up to 16 layers of wood. Additional panels carrying carved decoration were often glued on to the frame of a piece of furniture. These panels had been bent under extreme pressure with the application of steam to produce the dramatic curves that are a hallmark of Belter’s oeuvre, along with tight C” and “S” scrolls. The hardiness leant to wood by Belter’s lamination process enabled him to produce elaborate open crestings and aprons.
High-backed chairs provided him with an ideal canvas for his carving skills. Naturalistic depictions of flowers and fruits – vines were a favourite –feature alongside more Classical motifs such as scrolls. It is often only the quality of the carving and the audacity of the openwork that show that a piece came from his workshops. Better’s furniture was of a
consistently high quality and he was patronized
by some very wealthy New York clients. He
also designed a table in ebony and ivory for
display at the 1853 “Exhibition of the
Industry of All Nations”.
EXCLUSIVE TO A FAULT
Better’s refusal to cater to the mass market left him open to rivals who had no such qualms and made small fortunes selling a diluted version of Better’s pieces to aspiring, less wealthy consumers. Despite this, however, Better was not unsuccessful. In 1854, he had his own five-storey factory erected on Third Avenue, on the Upper West Side of
Manhattan. Two years later, he was joined in business by his brother-in-law, John H. Springmeyer. In 1861, William and Frederick Springmeyer also came aboard. When Better succumbed to tuberculosis in 1863, the Springmeyers continued in business. It is a testament to the singular skill of John Better that they were unable to survive for more than four years, despite the
unabated popularity of the Rococo-revival style that the firm had made its own. Better’s absence was felt keenly, and in 1867 the company was forced into closure.

Meissen
The attempts by Count Marcolini, director of Meissen from 1774, to improve the quality of Meissen porcelain were not entirely successful, and at the beginning of the 19th century the factory was still in decline. There were several reasons for this: competition from other porcelain factories in Europe, mass production, and the effects of the Napoleonic Wars (1799-1815). When Marcolini retired in 18 14, production was at a level j t high enough to keep the factory open.
Until the mid-19th century mass production grew steadily, thus reducing costs and meeting demand. From the 1820s the factory kept pace with new developments by using “round” kilns that led to a fourfold increase in production, and introducing new techniques and products. In the late 1820s gloss-gilding was introduced; this inexpensive method of decoration used gold mixed in a solution, which was applied to the porcelain. The time-consuming method of hand-pressing clay into moulds to produce plates with moulded decoration was replaced by pouring slip into glass moulds. One of the new mass-produced items was the lithophane (a thin, translucent plaque with moulded decoration that can be viewed by transmitted light), made from 1829, featuring religious or sentimental subjects.
The 19th-century international exhibitions popularized both new and historical styles by displaying artifacts from different cultures and civilizations, and manufacturers copied these objects using new techniques. Taste was now led by the bourgeoisie, and manufacturers’ output became more diverse to meet demand. More than one fashion was often popular at any one time, so 19th-century objects often display a bizarre combination of styles. The Biedermeier style was introduced c.1830; wares are similar in form to earlier Neo-classical pieces but are heavier, and have less elaborate decoration, often being painted with topographical views.
From the early 1830s the Rococo style was revived, and Meissen enjoyed a renaissance owing to its re-use from the late 1840s of 18th-century figure moulds. Rococo Revival figures and wares were greatly
in demand and formed the bulk of the factory’s production during the second half of the 19th century. Produced under the supervision of the chief modeller, Ernst August Leuteritz (1818-93), these figures are of Such typical 18th-century subjects as shepherds and shepherdesses, the aristocracy, and allegorical figures of the Seasons and the Four Continents. They can be distinguished from the originals by their hard, shiny gilding, harsh colours, and overelaborate decoration, such as intricate lacework, made by dipping real lace into the paste. The most notable Meissen products in other revival styles made during the second half of the 19th century include plates and cups and saucers of the 1840s, moulded or painted with Gothic arches and tracery patterns, and blue-ground krater vases painted with Classical scenes imitating medieval and Renaissance enamels. From the 1860s large-scale Renaissance Revival vases, often painted with flowers and blue-ground sections and with curling snake handles, became increasingly popular. From the 1870s the factory produced figures in contemporary costume, although these were outweighed by the number of Rococo and Neo-classical reproductions.
KEY FACTS
• BODY pure white hard-paste porcelain with a distinctive hard, glassy glaze
• STYLES Empire, Biedermeier, Rococo Revival, Neo-classical, Renaissance and Gothic Revivals
• PALETTE harsh versions of 18th-century colours, such as a strong pink and a yellowish green; figures covered completely with paint; hard, shiny gloss-gilding
• DECORATION encrusted flowers; topographical views on Biedermeier wares
Example
mythological figure group of a maiden sitting on a Neoclassical stool, binding Cupid’s wings with a ribbon, was
produced using a model that had originally been made by Christian Gottlieb Juchtzer, one of the modellers working at Meissen in the Neo-
classical style during the late 18th century The rather harsh palette, so typical of 19th-century Meissen figures and wares,
is especially
evident in the
red drapery over
the attendant’s
shoulder, which would never have been used on an 18th-century figure.

The great success of Meissen encouraged other European rulers to set up their own factories in the 1740s and 1750s. By the 1770s there were almost 20 factories in Europe producing hard-paste porcelain, often imitating the wares first produced at Meissen. The most significant are discussed below, although there were also several less important factories in the Saxon province of Thuringia producing high-quality wares on a much smaller basis, including those at Gotha (1756-1834), Kloster-Veilsdorf (est. 1760), Wallendorf (est. 1764), and Limbach (est. 1772).
HOCHSTIn
1746 the Elector of Mainz granted a privilege to Adam Friedrich von Lowenfink (1714-54) to establish a faience factory in Hochst, near Mainz. The factory manufactured porcelain only after the arrival of the arcanist Josef Jakob Ringlet ( 1730-1804) in 1750. Hochst became well known for its porcelain figures modelled by several notable craftsmen, such as Simon Feilner (1726-98), who modelled a dramatic set of commedia dell’arte figures and a few elaborate Rococo figures, Johann Friedrich Luck ( 1727-97), his brother Karl Gottlob Luck (c.1730-75), and Johann Peter Melchior (1742-1825), who became master modeller in 1767. Although Melchior’s figures often have a stiff or stylized appearance, there is much careful detailing in such features as the folds of clothes. One of the most characteristic elements of Melchior’s figures is the mound base, with either grass and earth, or rockwork detailed in green and brown.
The range of wares included trembleuse cups and saucers with plain surfaces and small modelled details such as animal or scrollwork spouts and wishbone handles. Wares were painted with landscape vignettes With figures, most frequently peasants or rustic scenes in the style of Dutch paintings, surrounded by small, scattered flowers. Polychrome decoration was common, but a distinctive palette of puce or green monochrome was also used.
The factory’s financial situation was always precarious, and it closed in 1796. The moulds of the Melchior models were sold to the Damm Pottery (est. 1827) in Aschaffenburg, where the designs were reproduced in faience from c.1830, although most existing pieces date from the mid-19th century. These arc often very similar to the porcelain originals and are highly collectable in their own right.
FRANKENTHAL
From 1752 Paul Antoine Hannong (1700-60) manufactured porcelain at his father’s faience factory (est. 1721) in Strasbourg with the help of Ringlet, who had previously worked at Hochst. In 1754 Louis XV banned the production of porcelain at Strasbourg in order to protect Vincennes from competition, and Hannong moved the factory to Frankenthal near Mannheim in the German Palatinate; production of hard-paste porcelain started the following year.
Frankenthal is noted for its figures, of which 800 different subjects have been identified. Among the finest are pastoral couples beneath elaborate Rococo arbours characterized by rather stiff modelling. The first modeller, Johann Wilhelm Lanz (active 1755-61), introduced scrolled Rococo bases. In 1762 Karl Theodor, the Elector Palatine, bought the factory and appointed Konrad Linck (1730-93) as chief modeller. Linck modified the style of the figures, enhancing the sculptural qualities of such features as drapery, and adding yellow and green grass or moss to the bases; he also introduced the first elements of Neo-classicism to the factory’s style. Johann Peter Melchior joined the factory from Hochst in 1779 and continued to make his distinctive models of children, often in biscuit porcelain.
Frankenthal produced a typical range of tableware, the forms of which were for the most part fairly simple with few sculptural details; plates, dishes, and large tea and coffee vessels often have moulded or pierced basketwork runs. Decoration of these wares was in a typical palette of strong, dark colours. The most common subject was naturalistic sprays of large flowers. loosely painted and surrounded by scattered smaller flowers. Jakob Osterspey (c.1730-82) specialized in mythological figures and musicians in idealized landscapes, after paintings by Watteau and Boucher. Also popular was trompe l`oeil decoration imitating grained wood, while in the 1770s to 1880s crimson and gold flowers over gilt-striped grounds were common.
When the Elector succeeded to the title of Elector of Bavaria in 1777 he moved to Munich, and without his support the factory went into decline. After French troops occupied the Palatinate in 1794 the factory was requisitioned, finally closing in 1799.
NYMPHENBURGIn
1753 the Elector of Bavaria established a porcelain factory in Neudeck, and in 1761 the factory was moved near to the Elector’s palace at Nymphenburg. The most outstanding products made at this factory are indisputably the figures by Franz Anton Bustelli
( 1722-63), one of the greatest exponents of the Rococo style. His forms are sty lized and gently twisting, often Slightly elongated, with simple, curvaceous forms. Many figures and groups were left unpainted or were painted with broad pastel washes. In t797 the modeller Johann Peter Melchior joined the factory from Frankenthal and produced Neo-classical biscuit figures. Tablewares include teapots that often have characteristic double-scroll handles and long spouts in the form of a swan’s head. The most popular type of decoration during the Rococo period was loose bouquets of flowers. Landscapes were either left untrained, half enclosed by rocaille frames, or framed by gilt cartouches.
LUDWIGSBURG
This factory was established by the Duke of Wurtemberg in 1758-9. The poor quality of the Ludwigsburg paste compared with some other German factories meant that it was more suitable for figures than for plain or sparsely decorated tableware. Under the direction of Gottlieb Friedrich Riedel the factory produced a variety of figures that appear rather stiff and very simplified, especially when compared with some of the more sophisticated work of such factories as Nymphenburg. The decoration is restrained, and the painting, most often in pastel colours, is precise. A series of miniatures made in the 1760s is among the most celebrated of the Ludwigsburg figures; representing market traders as well as courtiers, the figures were intended to form a miniature scene of an annual fair in Ludwigsburg. Teapots are generally bullet-shaped, often with fruit knops and bird’s-head spouts. Saucers are flared, as opposed to the rounded shape made elsewhere in Germany. Plates, dishes, tureens, and bowls typically feature a band of moulded and sectioned basketwork around the rims. Typical painted decoration includes unframed landscapes and scattered flowers. When the court moved to Stuttgart in the 1770x, the factory went into decline, arid it finally closed in 1824.
Hochst (1746-96)
• BODY hard-paste porcelain; opaque creamy white; generally flawless
• DECORATION landscape Vii usually of peasants Or rustic scenes in the manner of David Terriers (1610-90) with large figures; chinoiserie figures; naturalistic flower sprays
• tenses mound bases with grass and earth, or rockwork detailed in bright green and brown
Marks
Underglaze blue mark used from c.1750
Frankenthal (1755-99)
• Bony hard-paste porcelain; creamy off-white with a thin glaze but can tend toward greyish off-white, with tiny black specks of ash, or opaque white
• STYLE simple forms, plates, dishes, and large tea and Coffee vessels, often with moulded and sectioned or
pierced basketwork rims
• PALEI Fr. rich green, grey, carmine, brown, puce
• DI CORA I ION naturalistic flower sprays in style of Strasbourg; chinoiserie scenes with large figures; large birds in wooded landscapes
• FIGURES stiff modelling of a variable (often high)
quality; pastoral couples; some in biscuit porcelain
• BASES elaborate, with undulating and arched Rococo scrollwork, and often tufts of green moss
Marks
Underglaze blue Mark used during the period when Elector Karl Theodor owned the factory (1761-93)
Nymphenburg (est. 1753)BODY
• hard-paste porcelain; slightly creamy off-white,a dense with a wet-looking glaze, with greenish tone where it collects in hollows and corners
• STYLE characteristic double-scroll handle; simple “U”-shape for coffee-CLIPS and sugar-bowls
• PALETTE ochre, puce, mushroom-pink, brown, red
• DECORATION very skilful naturalistic flower-painting; landscapes with Classical ruins, statues, and small figures; large single figures
• FIGURES stylized, slightly elongated and curvaceous forms; later, stiffer Louis XVI-sty le figures; coloured deep pink and orange/tomato red in flat washes
• Bases on Bustelli figures these appear integral to the figure – flat, edged with asymmetrical scrollwork; also stepped pedestals
Marks
Impressed on wares made during the “Bustelli” period ( 1754-65)
Ludwigsburg (1727-1824)
• BODY hard-paste porcelain; greyish white and close-grained with distinctive smoky glaze, tends to be green where pooled
• FORMS bullet-shaped teapots; saucers with flared rims; Spouts in the form of birds or dragons, “C”-shaped scroll handles with shell or feather thumb-pieces
• PALETTE russet, puce, dark brown, green, yellow
• DECORATION naturalistic flower sprays; realistic figures after Watteau; fruit and flowers in Meissen style; landscapes with two or three tufts of foliage at the base
• FIGURES stiff with crisp modelling; coloured greyish puce, cobalt, yellow
• BASES grass and rockwork mounds or slabs, Rococo
FORSTENBERG
Charles I, Duke of Brunswick, established a factory at Furstenberg in 1747, but attempts to manufacture porcelain were unsuccessful until the arrival of Johann Kilian Benckgraff (1708-58) from Hochst in 1753. The factory encountered many technical problems, and early wares and figures often have flaws, such as black specks of ash in the body, or are slightly misshapen or cracked.
Many of the figures produced at Furstenberg imitated those produced at Meissen, Hochst, and Berlin. The most important modeller was Simon Feilner (1726-98) from Hochst, who became chief modeller in 1754; his work included a fine series of miners (1757-8) and, most notably, characters from the commedia dell’arte (C.1754). During the Neo-classical period the factory made Classical figures, including a series of biscuit busts of Classical poets and philosophers on pedestals. Copies of figures from 18th-century moulds were made in the 19th century, but can be distinguished from the originals by the clumsier decoration and harsher colours.
Early Fiirstenberg tablewares are particularly distinctive as they are often decorated with elaborate moulded Rococo scrollwork to disguise the flaws in the paste. Early decoration included flower sprays, sometimes in a green monochrome that indicates the influence of the Hochst craftsmen working at Fiirstenberg. Landscapes with buildings were generally left unframed and were painted in predominantly dark greens and browns. One of the factory’s most easily identifiable decorative themes is finely detailed poultry and other domestic birds perched on fences or branches.
BERLIN
The first porcelain factory at Berlin was founded by Wilhelm Kaspar Wegely in 1752. Some figures were copied directly from Meissen or from prints, and a series of small putti with large heads and limbs, dressed as members of various trades and professions, was also made. Tablewares and vases were painted in the style of Meissen, with naturalistic flowers, landscapes, and figures in the
manner of the French pastoral painter Antoine Watteau. Moulded flowers and foliage, and basketwork rims, were specialities of Wegely, and a range of moulded baskets was also made. The factory closed in 1757 because of financial problems during the Seven Years War.
In 1761 the merchant Johann Ernst Gotzkowsky set up another factory with craftsmen who had worked at Wegely’s factory, but it went bankrupt and was bought in 1763 63 by Frederick the Great. The new factory, which was known as the Royal Porcelain Factory, produced
wares in a distinctive late Rococo style. Tablewares were embellished with trelliswork, pierced rims, and flowers entwined in basketwork patterns. Painted decoration included scale-ground borders and naturalistic flowers, animals, and birds. The modeller Wilhelm Christoph Meyer (1723-85) produced the series “Cries of Berlin” as well as allegorical and Classical figures characterized by elongated forms and small heads. They are set on small, square bases and painted in salmon pink, puce, and black. Neo-classical wares introduced in the 1770s include vases and cylindrical cups. The decoration was sumptuous, with gilded Neo-classical motifs, views of Berlin, and monochrome portrait medallions. During the 1780s figures set on high pedestal or rocky bases imitated Neo-classical sculpture.
Furstenberg (1753-c.1800)
• BODY hard-paste porcelain; generally whitish with a glassy glaze, early paste often had flaws
• STYLE “C”-scroll handles; early pieces sometimes have moulded scrollwork or frames
• PALETTE dominated by greens and browns; also monochrome green or purple; figures often left white
• DECORATION unframed landscapes; birds or fowl; portrait medallions
• FIGURES Feilner’s miners were both painted and unpainted; Neo-classical biscuit figures are typical; skin is often highly coloured
• BASES simple mound or pad
Marks
Underglaze-blue mark used during the early period of production
Berlin: Wegely factory (1752-7)
• BODY creamy white, similar to Meissen but with a thinner glaze lending an opaque look
• GLAZE very glassy, similar to Meissen
• PALETTE white or painted in puce, iron red, or black
• DECORATION moulded flowers, trailing foliage, and basket rims; naturalistic flower-painting

Porcelain
Hausmaler
From the 17th century in Germany and Bohemia there Was an important industry of freelance artists who decorated faience, to help factories meet the demand for highly decorated pottery. These decorators, known as “Hausmaler” (”home painters”), worked in their own studios or workshops. Additionally, hoping to profit from the new porcelain industry, Hausmaler in Augsburg and elsewhere bought whitewares from Meissen in bulk and decorated them.
AUGSBURG
Hausmaler from Augsburg were among the first to decorate Meissen porcelain outside the factory, and thus their decoration is usually found on tableware of the 1720s. Gilt decoration is particularly associated with the Augsburg workshops and is the most common form of Hausmaler work found today. The best-known and most prolific studio was that of the brothers Abraham and Bartholomaus Seuter (1688-1747 and 1678-1754), who specialized in gilt decoration, particularly chinoiserie scenes in the manner of Johann Gregorius Horoldt ( 1696-1775) of Meissen, and hunting, genre, and mythological scenes set within ornate gilt scrollwork or foliate borders, or reversed on a solid gilt ground.
The other major Hausmaler workshop in Augsburg during the first half of the 18th century was that of the Auffenwerths, who painted chinoiseries in a style that is very similar to the Seuter workshop but which can be distinguished by its more feathery appearance. Sabina Auffenwerth (b.1706) is the best known of the family, for her polychrome chinoiserie panels in the style of Meissen, and genre scenes with large figures, sometimes painted in monochrome black, purple, or red, with the faces and arms highlighted in flesh tones.
OTHER CENTRES OF PRODUCTION
One of the most important Hausmaler in Germany was Ignaz Bottengruber (active 1720-30), who worked in Breslau. His work is characterized by detailed designs, high-quality gilding, and varied and subtle tones. He specialized in Bacchic, hunting, and military scenes framed by rich scrollwork, in addition to mythological and allegorical subjects. Ignaz Preissler (1670-1741), the son of a celebrated glass-decorator, Daniel Preissler ( 1736-1733), also worked in Breslau and later in Bohemia; he painted townscapes, landscapes, chinoiseries, and mythological scenes in black monochrome, known as “Schwarzlot” (”black lead”), or even in red monochrome.
The most prolific Hausmaler workshop of the later 18th century was that of Franz Ferdinand Meyer (active 1747-94) who worked in Pressnitz,
Bohemia. His work is recognizable by a
cool palette dominated by light green
and iron red, broad gilt scrollwork borders, and bouquets of flowers around the borders. The painter
F.J. Ferner (active 1745-50) may
have been one of Meyer’s assistants, because his style is similar. Ferner added enamelled and gilt decoration
of flowers, animals, figures, and trees to pieces decorated in underglaze blue at the Meissen factory.
KEY FACTS
• PALL I 1E monochrome red, purple, or black, and gilding are most typical of Hausmaler wares, but polychrome decoration is also found
• SUBJECTS chinoiseries, large figure scenes, landscapes,
mythological, and hunting scenes
Marks
Pieces decorated by Meyer and Ferner generally have the :Meissen crossed swords mark in underglaze blue; after c.1760 Meissen
introduced the cancelled crossed swords mark on imperfect or blank wares in order to prevent its products from being associated with the work of incompetent decorators

Chests-of-drawers before 1840.
BACHELORS’ CHESTS
Bachelors’ chests, so-called because they were originally placed in a “bachelor’s bedroom apartments”, were conceived as multi-purpose chests for storage, dressing, and writing. Predominantly of walnut, although oak and elm were used for more provincial examples, the earliest bachelors’ chests date from the late 17th century. Betrayed by their bun feet and broad, domed moulding framing the deep drawers, early bachelors’ chests are usually veneered with straight-grained walnut and simplecross banding. During the early 18th century the form became increasingly sophisticated, with neat dovetailing and the introduction of a brushing-slide above the top drawer; the heavy bun feet were discarded in favour
of shaped bracket feet. Although the form was replaced by the fashionable French commode design in the mid-18th century, provincial furniture-makers continued the tradition throughout the 18th century. However, these later examples are usually betrayed by their larger scale, often with mahogany-lined drawers, and Rococo or Neo-classical handles.
BOMBE COMMODES
The concept of a free-standing chest-of-drawers was first introduced by Andre-Charles Boulle (1642-1732). Initially known as tables en bureaux, and representing perhaps the earliest fusion between the table form and a sarcophagus-shaped coffer, Louis XIV Boulle commodes are characterized not only by their brass inlaid decoration but by their swollen “sarcophagus” or Roman-tomb form. During the Regence (1715-23), this developed into the commode en tombeau, which was widely manufactured by Parisian cabinet-makers. Under Louis XV bombe commodes became increasingly Rococo. Veneered on pine or oak carcases and usually with oak-lined drawers, they arc invariably enriched with parquetry or marquetry decoration, usually embracing fruitwoods and numerous exotic woods, particularly tulipwood and amaranth. More elegant and serpentine in shape than their predecessors, these commodes stand higher from the ground on slightly splayed legs with ormolu sabots (”shoes”). The geometric parquetry was often subtle, while the ormolu Mounts conveyed the full-blown Rococo spirit, perhaps nowhere more so than in the commodes of Charles Crescent (1685-1768).
Inspired by French prototypes, mid-18th-century bombe commodes with parquetry decoration were made throughout Europe, particularly in southern Germany (usually in elm and fruitwood, with long drawers above low aprons), Genoa and Naples (with distinctive dished aprons and
starburst kingwood cube parquetry), and Sweden (upright bombe form, pine carcases, and spring-locking drawers, such as those by the cabinetmaker Johann Christian Linning; 1759-1801).
The desire throughout Europe for all things “exotic”, particularly lacquer, encouraged such specialist “japanners” as John Stalker and George Parker in England, Gerard Dagly ( 16,57-1715) in Berlin, and the Martin family in Paris to produce their own versions. The name Martin became synonymous with the art of japanning, and indeed the technique is still known as vernis Martin. Louis XV commodes mounted with panels in vernis Martin painted in imitation of Oriental lacquer, with posies of flowers, and arcadian landscapes, were invariably commissioned by marchand-merciers (dealers in luxury goods) such as Simon-Philippe Poirier (1720-85). Regarded as the height of fashion and extremely expensive, they were mounted with luxurious ormolu mounts, and many can be accurately dated to between 1745 and 1749 through a tax mark.
GEORGIAN CHESTS-OF-DRAWERS
The commode reached England through such celebrated pattern-books as The Universal System of Household Furniture (1762) by John Mayhew (1736-1811) and William Ince (c.1738-1804) and The GGentleman Cabinet-Maker’s Director (1754-62) by Thomas Chippendale (1718-79), who described the form as a “French commode tables)”. However, the majority
of George II and George III chests-of-drawers are simple and plain, and the vast majority of those that correspond closely to published patterns arc usually Victorian. They are often of mahogany, with canted rectangular or
serpentine-fronted moulded tops above graduated drawers and moulded plinths with shaped bracket feet refinements to this basic form include fitted dressing-drawers or brushing-slides; canted angles carved with either trailing foliage, cluster-columns, or Chinese blind-fret; ogee or carved bracket feet; and luxuries such as superb lacquered-brass handles, cedar-lined drawers, and S-pattern keyholes, all of which are characteristic of Chippendale’s workshop. However, during the 1760s sumptuous marquetry commodes in the Louis XV manner, introduced by Pierre Langlois (active 1759-81) of Tottenham Court Road, London, became increasingly fashionable. As a result, plain figured mahogany was often discarded in favour of exotic woods, including sabicu, rosewood, and ebonny, and later satinwood, often with parquetry. During, the 1770s the marquetry style that had been so swiftly adopted for commodes by cabinet-makers such as John Cobb (C. 1715-78) and the firm of Ince & Mayhew (est. 1787) became increasingly linear and Neo-classical in design.
TRANSITIONAL AND NEO-CLASSICAL COMMODES
The explosion of Neo-classicism was slow to filter through, and sometimes during the 1760s there was an unhappy fusion of Neo-classical decoration on Rococo forms. Commodes of this type are known as Transitional, a form particularly identified with the French cabinet-makers Jean-Francois Oeben (1721-63) and Roger Vandercruse ( 172 8-99 ).
As the Transitional style became more refined, plain linear commodes, veneered in satinwood or mahogany and virtually denuded of mounts, were made. During the 1770s and 1780s the cabinet-makers Jcan-Henri Riesener (1734-1806) and Gilles Joubert (1689-1775) continued to supply the royal household with sumptuous commodes enriched with lavish Neo-classical ormolu Mounts and pictorial marquetry panels, while Etienne Levasseur (1721-98) and Adam Weisweiler (17441820) promoted a return to the “antique” style of the late 17th century particularly the brass inlay associated with Boulle. On a more modest level the basic commodes remained remarkably unchanged throughout the Louis XVI and Directoire (1795-9) periods. Made in the solid (as opposed to veneered) and usually of mahogany, although more provincial examples arc often of fruitwood, they have cared, moulded marble tops above two or three short frieze drawers and long panelled lower drawers, flanked by fluted angle columns, and stand on turned, tapering legs with toupie feet in brass caps. Dependent again on the figuring of the timber for impact, although this is often enhanced by brass stringing, they are restrained examples of architectural Neo-classicism. Particularly inspirational to English cabinet-makers through the influence of architects such as Henry Holland (1745-1806), this general form of commode was widely copied throughout Europe. It was through the work of the cabinet-makers David Roentgen (1743-1807), in Germany, and Christian Meyer (active 1787), who worked in Russia but may have trained under Roentgen, that this style reached its apogee.
MAGGIOLINI COMMODES
Neo-classical marquetry commodes were made throughout Europe from the 1770s. The fashion originated in Paris and rapidly spread across Europe. In Italy the Neo-classical style is synonymous with the Giuseppe Maggiolini (1738-1814) in Milan. His work is characterized by superb Neo-classical and arabesque marquetry in walnut, olivewood, and tulipwood, although he also used rosewood in the early 19th century. “Maggiolini” commodes are usually loosely constructed, with a rough-hewn softwood carcase and thickly dovetailed poplar-lined drawers. Owing to the prolific production of commodes from Maggiolini’s workshops during the early 19th century not to mention that of his competitors and imitators, the quality of work inevitably suffered. However, the enormously popular Maggiolini commode continued to be made during the 19th century.
EMPIRE AND RESTAURATION COMMODES
Empire furniture heralded a return to the ornament of Classical antiquity, inspired partly by Aventures dams la basse et la haute Egypte (1802) by Baron Vivant Denon ( 1747-1825). The French Empire style dominated European taste through such influential publications as Recueil de decorations interieures ( 1801-12) by Charles Percier (1764-1838) and Pierre Fontaine (c.1762-1853). These pattern-books illustrate the finest commodes executed for Napoleon I in the huge workshops of cabinet-makers including
Francois-Honore-Georges Jacob (1770-1841) and Bernard Molitor (c.1730-1833).
However, it is the designs of Pierre de La Mesangere, published as Collection de Meubles et Objets de gout (1802-35), that most clearly reveal the type of commode commissioned by less elevated patrons. These were initially veneered with mahogany on oak carcases, but the British blockade of 1806 prevented colonial timbers from getting to France, and the price of mahogany rose so high that cabinet-makers were forced to resort to such indigenous woods as maple, walnut, elm,ash, and yew. Empire commodes, both those with drawers and those
with doors (a vautaux), are linear in form, the marble tops often supported above panelled friezes with ormolu mounts, the drawers flanked by columns or Egyptian herm or caryatid figures, and often supported on ebonized hairy-paw feet.
Following the defeat of Napoleon (1815) and the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy, commodes became increasingly restrained and visually heavy relying on flame-figured timber for impact. Often with overhanging frieze drawers and largely denuded of mounts, even handles, they frequently stood on plain plinth bases, although shallow bun feet or plain square legs were also sometimes employed. As this style inspired European cabinet-makers, particularly those in Spain and Germany, it is often difficult the origin of Restauration commodes.
Under Charles X (1824-30) commodes in a lighter, less monumental taste again became fashionable, both in lighter woods, particularly bird’s-eve maple, and in the Gothic or a la troubadour style. Closely related in form to Restauration commodes, and largely unmounted, commodes in light woods were initially inlaid with stringing in exotic timbers such as amaranth and ebony, but during the 1830s and 1840s this evolved into increasingly lavish Boulle-style marquetry. In contrast, commodes made in the Gothic taste were made in mahogany and oak and were decorated with such carved ornament as crocketed finials and arcades. Although a revival of the Gothic taste had first been proposed by the architect Mansion as early as 1804, it was not until the 1830s and 1840s that it gained more widespread interest.
• VENEERING 17th- and 18th-century veneers are hand cut and thick ( 1-3min/tt in); later veneers were machine Cut and are paper thin; often the tops of chests-ofdrawers have been revenered because of damage (water, splitting), so it is important to check that the veneers are of the same uneven thickness all over.
• ALTERATIONS check that each of the drawers in chestof-drawers is of the same construction, as often one of them will have been changed because of damage.
• SHRINKAGE this is a common occurrence and is
frequently seen in the drawer bases; this is perfectly acceptable, and sometimes the splits have been repaired with canvas; those examples that do not show signs of shrinkage should alert suspicion.
• CONSTRUCTION Italian commodes are typically rather loosely constructed and made of cheap timber.

Meissen Porcelain of the 18th Century.
The great secret and success story of the Far East, porcelain was discovered a thousand years before the establishment of the ceramics industry in the West. Its properties were envied and widely imitated, but never matched, and its quality far outstripped that of early Western ceramic production, which was based on stoneware.
The first examples of Chinese porcelain arrived in Europe in the early 1500s and caused a near-revolution in the ceramics world, resulting in a thriving export industry from the East that had far-reaching effects on trade. Today, examples of fine-quality porcelain from both the East and the West command the highest prices, and many museums around the world have outstanding collections.
Early Meissen
Imported from the Middle Ages through trade with China, Oriental porcelain was a rare and expensive commodity in Europe. As demand for (and imports of) porcelain became greater, alchemists in the courts of Europe attempted to discover the formula to create “true”, or hard-paste, porcelain. The production of the first European hard-paste porcelain was the result of a collaboration between the alchemist Johann Friedrich Bottger (1682-1719) and the scientist Flurcriftied Walther von Tschirnhausen ( 1651-1708) at the court of Augustus the Strong, Elector of Saxony, in Dresden.
EXPERIMENTAL WARES
Bottger had become famous for his claims that he was on the brink of producing artificial gold. His experiments in this regard failed, but his fame and talents were such that Augustus seized Bottger after he fled from Prussia to Saxony and ordered him to help in von Tschirnhausen’s porcelain experiments. The basic formula, which was discovered c.1706-7, produced a fine, brownish-red stoneware. After further experimentation in 1708, Bottger finally v produced a white hard paste, and in 1710 Augustus established Europe’s first hard-paste porcelain factory in the Albrechtsburg, a palace in Meissen.
Bottger’s stoneware was an extremely hard and finely textured material, and is sometimes described as “Jaspisporzellan” (”jasper porcelain”) because of its resemblance to hardstone. The types of ware produced included and coffee- and teapots, bowls, teacups, and teajars, often imitating Oriental porcelain. One of the first artists to be involved in the modelling of this stoneware was the court goldsmith Johann Jakob Irminger (1635-1724), and maro, stoneware pieces were based on gold and silver designs. As the material was so hard, typical decoration included polishing or faceting -techniques derived from gem-cutting - although lacquering, enamelling, and gilding were also used.
EARLY PORCELAIN
Early Meissen porcelain (”Bottgerporzellan”), first produced commercially c.17 L3, generally followed the stoneware forms, but technical developments at the factory led to a greater range of ss ares: statuettes of dwarves and saints, copies of Chinese Mane-de-Chine wares, and “pagoda” figures. The porcelain was often left white to display the precious material, but some pieces have moulded leaf or floral borders, thickly applied and clumsily drawn polychrome enamels, or gilt or silvered scrollwork borders. While all Bottger porcelain is rare, figures and enamelled pieces are particularly scarce.
During the 1720s there were rapid technical and artistic advances in the development of porcelain at Meissen, due in part to the arrival in 1720 of the colour-chemist and painter Johann Gregorius Horoldt (1696-1775). In the early v 1720s, under his leadership, a new source of clay was found from which a slightly creamy white paste was produced. This was used to make a much wider range of wares, including vases, garnitures, bottles copied from Japanese originals, and small vessels with covers, as well as tea and coffeewares.
During the 1720s Horoldt perfected the enamelling process, increasing the range of
colours. Until the early 1730s the’ factory owed its success to the skilled painters who copied or adapted Oriental porcelain decoration and eventually developed a distinctive European style of painting. In the , i rly 1720s, underglaze blue decoration was used for copying Chinese originals in the style of wares made during the reign of Emperor Kangxi (1662-1722), and polychrome enamels were employed for making exact copies of Chinese and Japanese wares, including those in the Imari and Kakicinon palettes. Horoldt also produced his own designs for vignettes and chinoiserie scenes. During the mid-1720s the first European-style landscape decoration was introduced; the scenes are typically set within heavy gilt scrollwork cartouches, often embellished with coloured enamels. The factory also introduced Kauffahrtei (”sea trade”) scenes of quaysides, although these became more common in the 1730s.
Meissen figures and services
From the early 1730s beautifully modelled and painted figures and table services were produced at the Meissen porcelain factory in Germany, establishing its reputation as the pre-eminent porcelain factory in Europe. The extensive range of figures and wares was characterized by an extraordinary virtuosity of modelling, lively expression, and sense of movement, and remains a testimony to the skill of the painters, modellers, and other artisans employed. The factory dominated the mid-18th-century style of porcelain, and Meissen wares Lind figures were imitated by craftsmen at other porcelain factories throughout Europe.
EARLY FIGURES
Small figures used to decorate the dining-tables of the wealthy were originally modelled in sugar, wax, or gum by cooks and confectioners. Demand for pieces in a more permanent material led to the production of the first porcelain figures at Meissen in 1727, when the modeller Johann Gottlieb Kirchner (1706–after 1738) was appointed the first chief modeller. Kirchner initially produced figures of saints and animals in a strong Baroque style. In the same year Frederick-Augustus 1, Elector of Saxony (known as “Augustus the Strong”),entrusted him with the task of creating 910 monumental figures of animals and birds to decorate his Japanese Palace in Dresden, specially built to accommodate his vast collection of Oriental porcelain. However, the thick body of the porcelain meant that pieces tended to crack or even completely collapse in the kiln. The most famous Meissen modeller,
Johann Joachim Kandler (1706-75), joined the factory in 1731 to assist Kirchner, but he too could not solve the technical problems. These difficulties and the high cost of producing such works encouraged Kandler to experiment with the production of small-scale figures.
LATER FIGURES
In 1733 Kandler was appointed chief modeller at Meissen, and during the 1730s and 1740s he was responsible for some of the finest individual figures and groups ever made there. Kandler’s early figures have a wonderful sense of liveliness and movement unmatched by his imitators. They are vigorously modelled, dramatic, and sculptural, and make flamboyant or theatrical gestures. Among the extraordinary range of subjects were exotic birds, figures from distant lands, couples in romantic or chivalric poses (known as “crinoline” groups), and humorous depictions of court jesters. Some of the best-known and most popular figures by Kandler are the characters such as Harlequin, Columbine, and ScaramOLIche from the connniediar dell’arte, the Italian theatre tradition. Kandler also depicted street vendors in two series called the “Cris dc Paris” and the “Cris do Londres”, some of which were inspired by prints based on the drawings of the French artists Latrine BOLIcharclon and Christophe IT act. Sonic of these figures were produced in collaboration with other highly skilled modellers who joined the factory in the mid-18th century: Johann Friedrich Eberlein (169,5-1749), Friedrich Elias Meyer (1723-85), and Peter Reinicke (1715-68).
In the mid-18th century the fashion for the Baroque style declined, to be replaced by the delicate, lighthearted Rococo style. Figures of lovers in idyllic pastoral settings, as well as allegorical and mythological figures representing the seasons, the months, and Classical gods and goddesses, were made in keeping with the new, more romantic, frivolous style. From c.1750 to 1755 the factory made smaller-scale figures, which were painted with such pastel colours as pale mauve, lemon yellow, and soft green. The simple, flower-encrusted pad or rockivork bases that had been employed during the 1730s and 1740s were abandoned in the 1750s in favour of more elaborately scrolled bases.
Africa and Asia by Meyer Allegorical figures and groups representing the seasons and the continents were particularly popular during the Rococo period In this group, Africa is represented by a black putts, wearing an elephant-shaped head-dress and seated on a lion, while Asia is depicted as a white putts, wearing a jewelled necklace - two contrasting depictions that are very much a European fantasy of the inhabitants of these two continents The highly scrolled base and somewhat elongated heads are typical features of Meyer’s work and of mid-18thcentury Meissen figures. Although Meyer’s figures are of very high quality, they are riot as collectable as those by Kandler.
TABLEWARES AND SERVICES
In addition to figures, Kandler and his team of designers and modellers created an extensive range of dinner services, tea and coffee services, centrepieces, candlesticks, ladies’ toilet sets, and other useful and decorative wares. By the 1730s Meissen porcelain had become extremely fashionable throughout Europe, and the factory received many commissions.
The commission for Meissen’s largest, most famous, and beautifully modelled service, known as the “Swan” service, came in 1736 from the factory’s director, Count Heinrich von Bruhl, who had recently married. Each plate, painted with the coat of arms of the Count and his new, wife, is exquisitely modelled in low relief with a design of swans, herons, pelicans, and rushes, while the tureens are of sumptuous curving forms incorporating an elaborate design of dolphins, mermaids, and other marine creatures. The Count’s name, which translates as “swampy meadow” or “marshy ground”, may have inspired the theme.
The exquisite and imaginative decoration that the printer and chemist Johann Gregorius Horoldt (1696-1775) had brought to early Meissen wares continued during the 1730s. From 1729 Augustus the Strong commissioned the factory painters to make
copies of his collection of Oriental porcelain, and they adapted the decoration on Japanese Kakiemon wares and Chinese famille-verse wares to create a new style of decoration known as indianisa-bic Blumen
(”Indian flowers”), so called because much Oriental porcelain was exported into Europe by the Fist India Companies. In the early 1730s, land- and cityscapes framed with heavy gilt scrollwork
or interlaced strapwork borders were a popular alternative to dower decoration, but from c.1735 battle scenes and hunting subjects inspired by the French painter Antoine Watteau were favoured. V ith the development of the Rococo style the popularity of flower decoration increased, and European flowers were used fit painted designs.
The painter Johann Gottlieb Klinger (active 1731-46) was the best-known exponent of this style. At first petals, leaves, and stems were very precisely depicted, as the painters followed botanical prints; the design was enlivened with scattered insects and butterflies. The relaxed attitude of the Rococo led to the use of more naturalistic sprays or bouquets in a style known as deutsche Blumen (”German flowers”). By the mid-1750s this style had been replaced by looser representations of scattered flowers, described as NFiretacriblumen (”mannered flowers”).
Academic and Marcolini
After the end of the Seven Years War (1756-63) there was a period of decline at the Meissen factory, due to the deprivations of the war and the loss of several important painters and modellers. Meissen’s share of the burgeoning European porcelain market was further reduced as Austria and Prussia banned Meissen imports, and Britain, France, and Russia placed high tariffs on imported Meissen pieces in order to protect domestic production. Meissen lost its place as the dominant force of innovation, originality, and quality to other factories such as those in Berlin, Vienna, and Sevres, which it often now attempted to imitate.
THE DOT/ACADEMIC PERIOD
The period 1763 to 1774 is generally known as the “Dot” period, because the mark used at this time consisted of the familiar crossed swords with a dot added between their hilts, or the “Academic” period, because much of the factory’s output lacked originality. The factory continued to manufacture figures and wares in the mid-18th-century style hat, in a poorer-quality paste, these did not match the standard of earlier pieces. There were few innovations in the design and decoration of tableware in this period, with flowers the most popular painted subject. A debased form of deutsche Blumen (”German flowers”), these bouquets can be distinguished from earlier Meis-cnn painting by the often “painterly” style, the pale palette with a predominance of pink tones, and the smaller-scale and often scattered flowers, following the style of Sevres.
Figures were often reproduced from moulds dating from the 1730s but lack the bolder, lively decoration of the originals; the palette is sometimes pale and lacklustre, and intricate, fussy patterns
often appear. The Neo-classical style, characterized by simple, geometrical forms and the use of Greek and Roman architectural ornament, was introduced to Meissen by the French sculptor Michel-Victor Acier (1736-99), appointed to work as chief modeller with Kindler. Acier produced small-scale, sentimental figure groups characterized by stiffer modelling in line with file restrained character of the Neo-classical style.
THE MARCOLINI PERIOD
In 1774 Count Camillo Marcolini (1739-1814) was appointed director of Meissen; under his leadership Neoclassicism was more wholeheartedly adopted and the quality greatly improved. Biscuit porcelain was favoured for allegorical or Classical figures, because it resembled the marble used for ancient Classical sculpture. In the I 790s the modeller Johann Carl Schonheit (1767-1805) made figures in the Sevres style after such sculptors as Etienne Falconer.
The Neo-classical taste is also reflected in the forms and decoration of the tableware. Cylindrical coffee-cups with angular handles and covers seem to have been used for display and presentation rather than for drinking. Marcolini also introduced a wider range of very fine decoration that included mythological and pastoral scenes, portraits and landscapes, and, later, portrait medallions, topographical landscapes, and details of paintings. Flower-painting also continued during this period. The bouquets were often large and dense and somewhat stiffly painted, with fewer scattered flowers than in the designs of the 1760s.

Featured at Antcollectors Porcelain

meissen antique figures
meissen blanc de chine candlesticks
meissen elephant groups
meissen figures four continents
meissen figures ”four continents”
meissen figures on bronze bases
meissen harlequin kandler
meissen kandler figure groups
meissen porcelain animals+frederick augustus
meissen porcelain rectangular plate
meissen scattered flowers tea sets
meissen snuffer
meissen soft paste
meissen tureen marcolini
meissen whiteware animal
meissen, four continents